GHG verification and validation
Formal work follows the applicable programme, accredited-entity, competence and authorization requirements. Conclusions are issued only through the required route.
Service Boundaries
Clear roles for credible independent work
This page explains how verification, audits, training and research are scoped. It is kept separate so the main site can focus on client needs and delivery capability.
Operating Model
Four clearly governed workstreams
Second- and third-party audits
Management-system and supplier audits are delivered against agreed criteria, scope and client mandate, with findings and follow-up kept distinct from training.
Professional training
Training develops capability through courses, cases and exercises. It does not issue or predetermine a formal verification, validation, audit or assurance conclusion.
Research and knowledge products
Research, publication training and Academy materials are educational outputs and are governed separately from formal independent engagements.
Engagement Controls
Checks completed before formal work
Scope and criteria
The subject matter, organizational or product boundary, reporting period, applicable standard and intended users are agreed before work starts.
Competence and authorization
Sector competence, personnel qualifications, programme rules and any accredited-entity requirements are checked against the assignment.
Independence and conflicts
Roles, previous work, commercial relationships and team allocation are reviewed before accepting independent work.
Reporting route
The entity responsible for the final report or conclusion is identified in the proposal and engagement documentation.